My opinion about imaginary mass

This article relates to the origins of the SMUT particle that is talked about in different blogs.

I wrote this short paper in early 2013. In those times I nominated the SMUT particle as being related to the Chameleon [CP] particle which was then renamed the All Seasons particle. Whilst I may not write an article of this type in a similar fashion today, however, I do feel it provides an interesting insight as to how my mind was working at that time. I have also posted because in my opinion it contains interesting and valuable information within it that my readers may care to speculate about as well. It seems likely that I had secondary material on standby in order to string my argument together in the manner that I did. Because the SMUT particle plays a very important role in establishing the validity of the Awareness model of physics that I created I urge you to take the time to read what I consider to be the most relevant SMUT particle blog.

My original work relating to imaginative mass

Quote:

“I referred to the contents of the tachyon field as being Browning dispersed coordinated framework of its own that in turn is embraced in my instantaneous fourth dimension. Dispersed Brownian means in clumps of diverse particles that are more adjacent to gravitational fields. I have referred to this imaginative mass as being phenomena that is in as imaginative state, a state observed by an imaginary now-observer from either a state within or external to an additional fifth dimension (not space time except from a two dimensional perspective). As I suggested earlier my CP particle (chameleon) has imaginary mass, energy and velocity. I have already shared the energy and velocity components. My debate proceeds along the following lines. I build an argument that generally points to the fact that although tachyon fields are important for movement and behavior of individual strings of mass (possibilities), tachyon particles themselves are stand alone particles with each one having both properties of the CP particle. This is thought (individual particle energy and driver as well as mass that is derivative of the fourth dimensional field of most possibilities (not including thought itself that remains as a standard item). I argue whilst tachyons have a space ether (foam type) speed ordinary particles have a more restricted dimensional momentum less than the speed of light. In other words they remain mere strings of information with the capacity to link up with another string altogether to become a full blown sub atomic particle.

I have referred to the tachyons in my fourth dimension as having both imaginary particle and field properties at the same time (because of imaginary mass). I argue because my CP particle has both imaginary and real mass and velocity (we know both thought and awareness are both space time real) it seems to make sense to meld the imaginative tachyon particle (with all possibility mass entwined therein) to the CP particle so as to become a single unit whilst the transfer occurs (through inter dimensional black holes I refer to as being tornado tunnels) into a space time format. At this point both are in imaginary supposition with dual properties of dissimilar mass possibilities. When in tandem they both proportionately expand as their combined speed moves from being instantaneous to just below the speed of light and grow mass accordingly. At the near speed of light the enormous (infinitesimal) energy behind the process creates the conditions where (in a combined state of temporary state superstition) they explode and once again become separated. The tachyon particle (with its own virtual mass but retains imaginary velocity and energy), surrounded by its own tachyon field then becomes like a driver to do something such as a cosmic embryo of all future observable phenomena and in itself promotes the conditions for the fore runner of the Higgs particles that in turn converts the already existing imaginative tachyon mass into broad space time matter, devoid of driver energy (dark matter). In the meantime the CP particle has in its own right moved from being imaginary to virtual. This means both driver and mass (most possibilities) start here and revert to becoming a unit of realness (something we can all identify with), with all of its own QM properties. These properties can then be embraced within the (changed) tachyon Higgs particle to become its indeterminable driver and eventually the essential conditions for the creation of atoms and molecules that in turn eventually evolve into the space time conditions we refer to as reality. I acknowledge these few words do not do justice to the enormity of this area of my beliefs and associated scientific challenges arising there from. I close this section by restating if the unmeasurable energy of my fourth dimension (through the medium of thought) was bought to bare at a single focus point like a giant black hole, the unlimited energy needed to convert faster than light (instantaneous) speed tachyons into space time (observable) reality is readily available to complete the task of creating the suitable conditions for not only one Big Bang but infinitesimal numbers of big bangs throughout infinitesimal (absolute) time.”

3/March/2013

The relationship between the Awareness model of physics and a supporting experiment

A descriptive experiment that supports the Awareness model of physics.

This experiment between Freeman and Grant. The experiment is a sub-atomic particle testing project that supports the Awareness model of physics hypothesis which two-dimensionally described herein. The Awareness model is an all embracing theory that attempts to explain and describe the inherent nature of reality.

The Awareness model of physics is akin to the Bohm [holographic] implicate model and it can be shown that there is only technical differences between each model. The Bohm model has been favourably tested. The attached file provides evidence as to how the experiment may be conducted.

The graphics below describe the essential nature of the experiment

 

Static particle experiment 1 new

 

Static particle experiment 2 new

 

If you care to learn more about the SMUT particle experiment click here.

The inherent nature and qualities of the All Seasons Particle

I see this a a defining blog in relationship to my [sub-quantum] Awareness model of physics

I will not talk about the origins of my concept of an All Seasons Particle (A.S.P.). Because I have already discussed it at length in various parts of my website and this includes on pages one and two of my blog titled “The finer aspects of reality – a secular argument”. I have argued that my A.S.P. has two inherent properties. These are primordial awareness (the implicit characteristics relating to my Awareness model of physics) and explicit characteristics which are thoughts. I argue that these two properties operate in a seamless conjunctional relationship with each other and as such I say it is a cosmic field.

I also argue that in a super-luminal (beyond the speed of light), “c” environment, that the property of a thought/s are imaginary particles and in a luminal 3D environment that they are both particles and virtual particles interacting with each other across the perimeter of my concept of a timeless fourth dimension [primordial awareness] and 3D space. For purposes of descriptive convenience I suggest that the boundary between my fourth dimension and space time is an arbitrary Planck length. However, I know that this is not exactly the case at all. I argue that both of these space features are in a concurrent relationship with each other, and from a practical perspective, Einstein’s clock time and Lorentz absolute time, are, for all intents and purposes in both a concurrent, but interacting, relationship with other. My blog Two dimensional big picture reality is indicative of these words. Also see Important note about the formation of the virtual version of the SMUT particle. This blog provides information about the formation of the SMUT particle, which is used in an experiment entitled “The static mass universe tracking particle experiment” that helps establish the existence of the All Seasons Particle.

I will now quote extracts from my blog titled: “The finer aspects of reality – a secular argument” which will serve the purpose of introducing my readers to the inherent nature and qualities (properties) of my concept of an A.S.P.

 

Quotes:

“…I argue that before the Big Bang, there existed a 4D dimension along the lines that I have just discussed. I believe that there existed a universal cosmic particle that informationally created the Big Bang in the first place, and that this particle has universal cosmic properties by which it can transverse all other dimensions and universes. An experiment has been devised by my associate that may assist in establishing the truth of this statement. …”

“…I suggest that not only did my concept of a universal particle create the characteristics that caused the Big Bang in the first place at a virtual and implicit level, but it also created the implicit phenomena that constitute 3D space as well. By this I mean that the elements of primordial awareness (embracing the universal particle/s) can be seen as a type of cosmic space foam that manifests itself as a wave throughout our universe. In a broader sense I am suggesting the following:-

The universal particle took upon itself both implicit and explicit characteristics. The implicit characteristics are the virtual (metaphysical and massless) characteristics that existed in my concept of a fourth dimension in the first place. The explicit characteristics it bought with it I see as being a molten plasma of quarks, leptons (sub-quarks) and gluons (particle binders necessary to create material atoms). I believe that this cocktail of activity that was taking place at the time of the Big Bang, once the plasma cooled, was like minute strings of material elements of my concept of a universal particle. I believe that these same strings account for the creation of tachyon fields which are a prerequisite for the creation of all Higgs particles, including us. …”

 

I argue that the same universal properties of my A.S.P. are naturally the essential features of all phenomena whatsoever. And, as I suggested earlier this is both in an implicit and explicit environment. This also means the Higgs Particle could be seen as merely one of an unlimited number of possibilities to do something (explicitly or implicitly). My A.S.P, because of its dualistic properties and thought/s (thoughts could be virtual particles waiting to do something) this phenomena has not only its own inherent awareness but also it has memory. The A.S.P. can remain in a fixed state in which circumstances it does not decay i.e. has mass and if it so elects to, can render its properties of energy and speed to mass only (other properties being virtual/imaginary in the physics sense). This also means it could covert itself into an allied particle altogether (such as a Higgs Particle or a Tachyon).

The difference between the Grant SMUT Particle and my concept A.S.P. Particle and any sub-particles thereto (such as Grant’s SMUT Particle) is that my A.S.P. can travel instantly at will between all other dimensions and universes. Sub-particle variants to my A.S.P. cannot do this. I argue that sub-particles are restricted in movement to space-time activity or to an adjacent anti-matter universe or the inter-universe bulk. In my wider writings about this subject I suggest at the time of the Big Bang my (imaginary above c, A.S.P.) moved from an imaginary state to an ever dynamic virtual status. By this I mean like patterns of virtual particles (implicit thoughts) that formed sub-quark like properties, properties that progressively processed themselves around one or more of the twenty cosmic numbers (cosmic constants) that all directly influence and control the whole of our 3D universe reality. This includes all allied characteristics (for example variances of colour) as well. This not only includes our 3D universe but also us along the way.

I will close this blog by quoting from the same paper that I cited above. I have written up additional ideas that I have about the A.S.P. in hardcopy. Readers should note that I am quoting was written nearly three years ago and as such the science terminology I used then does vary to that I employ today. However, I believe will my readers will be able to identify with the parallel nature of the language that I use between both.

 

Quotes:

“…These strings (embryonic virtual particles) are derivative of thought, mass (possibilities to do something) self awareness and instantaneous velocity. The strings are the embryo of future particle properties. From this a wave pattern is created amongst this chaos and eventually packets of strings come together that fluctuate in unison. These blocks begin to resonate, themselves (as blocks) and doing so create their own energy field and associated wave. In essence these blocks symbolise the fact that what was once single properties have been slowly converted into a single possibility that has identifiable scientific meaning. The process of connection is referred to by standard model physicists as the Brownian motion. In short I claim CP particles (All Seasons Particle) are the single phenomena that emerges from the volcanic tunnel and with its universal properties (imaginary mass, energy and speed) can do all things in all manner of ways. This is why I have nominated it as being an all seasons particle. This includes imaginative intention because it can both think and is aware and it still retains the same properties of all knowing total awareness. This is because it was derivative of my fourth dimensional home in the first place. This includes all possibilities to do something after it has melded with thought. …”

“…For purposes of this explanation I shall refer call my CP particle (All Seasons Particle) as being in a space time frame traveling just under the speed of light. I shall call its essential properties of energy (thought), mass (all possibilities) and speed (which can in this instance be variable) as not being real at all, but virtual. This position best suits my purposes to better explain things along the way. This means while the particle can be seen as virtual in real terms it is not they really exist. I argue the CP particle created another particle similar to itself but a particle with mass only, with the characteristics of energy and speed, not virtual but imaginary. I argue it is this rearranged state of the CP particle is what is commonly referred to as a tachyon field. This tachyon field is able to lower its own energy. As such it forms a particle, a particle in the form of a condensate. I argue this condensate has positive energy characteristics but whilst in its uncondensed state (field) form it has negative energy characteristics. It is generally excepted in the standard model of physics it is the positive field that is referred to as a Higgs particle whilst residual negative tachyon fields remain exactly as that – a simple tachyon (even though it is scientifically still a field).

I sum up my position in the following way. I see how the condensated characteristics of a tachyon become the embryo of a Higgs particle and the negative components of the uncondensed field remains important for the conveying of individual strings of the sub-CP particle (SMUT particle) to involve itself being entangled in all manner of new phenomena (converting possibilities into what we commonly refer to as every day reality). However, this creation process remains below the speed of light. As far as the Higgs particle is concerned (with positive energy properties). I feel it can be argued that once it has been fully developed, it has a tachyon type of engorged mass and characteristics, which in turn evolve into specific atoms and molecules (something scientifically real) to do something. In other words, incorporating some ideas from others, (such as Grant), my CP particle (all seasons) type of particle is the instigator of all that we commonly refer to as reality. …”

Concluding the SMUT particle discussion

Text and supporting references

The All Seasons particle can be derivative of a process whereby particles with imaginary properties can interrelate to form new particles. The particles with new imaginary properties can include particles such as tachyons, dybbuks, and the proposed SMUT (Static Mass Universe Tracking) particle. The process through which this interaction occurs is as illustrated on Fig. 1. The process in which the SMUT particle can be seen to be derivative of the all seasons particle is shown on Fig. 2, this includes how both particles come together to interact within my concept of a timeless primordial dimension. Fig. 2 is self explanatory. The process by which the SMUT particle is created can be via the All Seasons particle splitting is also as demonstrated in Fig. 1. The All Seasons particle can to choose to split into two particles with opposite attributes, this does not mean they are anti-particles of each other.

The SMUT particle has positive mass and imaginary (zero) momentum. A tachyon has negative mass and faster than light momentum. Mathematically the SMUT and the tachyon have many opposite attributes. This does not mean they are anti-particles to each other. That only applies to matter and anti-matter.

The process of an All Seasons particle splitting into a SMUT particle and a tachyon particle conforms to Quantum Mechanics (QM) laws as it is a reversible process. A tachyon particle and SMUT particle merging will recreate an All Seasons particle, in part because the SMUT and tachyon have opposite attributes.

We have classified the All Seasons, SMUT, tachyon and dybbuk as all in the same family of particles as they all have imaginary properties. The SMUT particle relates to the All Seasons particle in two ways: One is that the SMUT particle can be derived from the All Seasons particle, either with a tachyon or without. Two, the SMUT particle and the All Seasons particle are both particles that have imaginary properties. The SMUT particles has imaginary momentum, the All Seasons particle has other properties that are imaginary except that of momentum.

It has to be noted that the SMUT particle appears to move because it is static and the universe moves around it. If you were to detect a SMUT particle you would see it in motion because you are in motion due to the Earth’s movement through space. Because of this effect, from the point of an observer the SMUT the particle appears as a moving particle, but this is an illusion. The SMUT particle gives the illusion that it is in motion, but it is truly static.

SMUT particle and its relationship to the uncertainty principle:

This part of the blog is for those who may be skeptics of the SMUT particle concept in relationship to the uncertainty principle. The uncertainty principle only applies to particles with real momentum. The SMUT particle has imaginary momentum and this changes its relationship to the uncertainty principle. The SMUT particle does not speed up or slow down, this would cause it to lose energy and convert into cosmic rays. Its wavelength would not get larger as it slows down because it cannot change speed without potentially being destroyed.

In the experiment to detect the SMUT particle we do not know exactly where it was formed. After it has formed it becomes a wave as would any other quantum particle and appears to move towards the detectors surrounding the SMUT particle’s point of origin. The size of the wave is irrelevant as it still collapses as it appears to travel through the detectors, just as any other particle would. This negates the De Broglie wavelength theory. For more details of the SMUT particle experiment follow the link to the website. For more information see the weblink here: http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=36050.0

We have discovered online works done in relation to researching tachyons. The articles we refer to for this as Bilaniuk_Metarelativity, https://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/jcuevas/Teaching/Taquiones.pdf and Fig 3. In these articles we found that the error committed in finding tachyons was trying to observe their effects, such as Cherenkov radiation. These experiments failed and the research was abandoned. The difference between the SMUT particle experiment and the experiments done decades ago is that my experiment tries to observe the SMUT particle directly as opposed to observing the effects given off by a particle. Trying to observe only the effects of a tachyon may be why the older experiments failed.

The same articles also refer to the mathematics involved in static particles. Admittedly the equations shown were not proof that static particles can be mathematically proven to possibly exist, as is the situation with the equations relating to the tachyon. It has to be said that the mathematics referred to in the articles lends weight to the idea that static particles, such as the SMUT particle could be proven to exist mathematically by someone versed in creating physics related equations.

The Casimir effect has an important role to play in the SMUT particle experiment as it is the way to access, i.e. create SMUT particles. The details of how the Casimir effect works are described in the audio provided below and in this Youtube link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRcmqZkGOK4. By the process of the Casimir effect on virtual particles in the space foam we can bring SMUT particles into our existence. From there we can measure them in the SMUT particle experiment.

The reason for the importance of the SMUT particle in the Awareness model of physics is that if you can prove the existence of the SMUT particle, as described in the SMUT particle experiment, then it proves that the All Seasons particle can exist. The All Seasons Particle is the backbone of the Awareness physics model.

The link to the SMUT particle experiment is here:

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/the-static-mass-universe-tracking-s-m-u-t-particle-experiment/

Grant 7/Nov/14

Fig. 1:

SMUT tachyon split

Fig. 2:

CP and SMUT particles new

Fig 3.

SMUT mod chart

https://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/jcuevas/Teaching/Taquiones.pdf

Extracts (part 1) from George T. Rado online article:

Note: This shows mathematics relating to static particles.

Extracts (part 2) from George T. Rado online article:

Note: This loosely describes attempts to detect tachyons via the Cherenkov radiation they leave behind.

Source: http://www.colorado.edu/physics/phys3320/phys3320_sp12/AJPPapers/AJP_E&MPapers_030612/Bilaniuk_Metarelativity.pdf

The dynamic feature of the Awareness physics model is the SMUT particle

A practical experiment that supports the Awareness physics model

The following sub-atomic particle testing project is a joint experiment between Freeman and Grant. This preamble introduces the presentation that describes a physical experiment that supports the Awareness model hypothesis.

We demonstrate a test to authenticate the Awareness model as well as its perceived, diverse benefits to science. The Awareness model of physics is an all embracing theory that attempts to explain and describe all important facets of reality as we understand it to be. This includes the primordial beginnings of all existence. The Awareness model is akin to the Bohm holographic (implicit order) model which is well known in science circles, but there are technical differences and one of these is that the Awareness model defines and describes as specific (secular) commencement point for all of reality. The Bohm model does not.

The Bohm mode has been favorably tested whereas the Awareness model has not. The attached file provides evidence as to how a single type of physics particle can not only be tested but also provide some important complimentary benefits for physics as well. These include finding the centre of the universe and energy generation. There are other benefits as well which are discussed in a separate question and answer forum. The experiment sets forth to demonstrate the existence of a particle which has imaginary momentum. We have nominated the particle as being named the Static Mass Universe Tracking (SMUT) particle. The manner in which the experiment is created is also described.

The testing model is incorporated within the single pdf file that follows. This file provides all information in relationship to the experiment project. This includes a Q & A answer sheet that we feel is relevant for readers to be aware of. A series of separate blogs have been set aside for easier reader understanding. It is the same information as in the pdf file which is in a complete form.

The SMUT particle experiment master copy