A synopsis of my views relating to the origins and general workings of reality
The contents of this blog repeat ideas that I have already shared with you in other areas of my website. However, my purpose with this blog is to attempt to package all of the most important ideas that I have about the origins of reality, and to explain why it works in the manner that I believe it does. My primary objective today is to create a background to my wider ideas about reality for the benefit of my readers, who may feel bewildered and disbelieving of much of the phenomena that I seek to share with them.. The word that seems to best describe what I am attempting to say is ‘nature’, but this is not exactly what I mean.
Included in what I say is how we make decisions and subsequently behave in the manner that we do. I will not discuss individual topics such as decision making, consciousness, instinct and similar phenomena in this short presentation. I have already written much about such topics in numerous other blogs in my website. What I hope I may have achieved by writing this blog is that my readers will have at least a greater appreciation of how my concept of the science of reality metaphorically fits together from a two dimensional perspective. I point out that my ideas about reality are not unique. Many other authors have also written about it over the centuries.
I believe that reality commenced in an absolute time environment and that the secular facilitator of the origins of reality was a metaphorical atmosphere of primordial awareness (implicit/metaphysical awareness). I believe that a single thought emerged from this implicit awareness, and this thought facilitated more thoughts. This process replicated itself until such time as patterns of thoughts that meant something of a non-materialist nature came together. I refer to this phenomenon as being a primordial experience. I see these patterns of thoughts as expanding in width, depth and density until such time as a base of neural network type information and knowledge was created. I believe that no such information and knowledge existed prior to the emergence of the first thought. This information and knowledge base derived its accumulated knowledge from its own infinite and constantly expanding cosmic experience. This cosmic experience I refer to as being sub-quantum phenomena that is aside from (greater than) the speed of light.
My ideas relating to sub-quantum phenomena means that there are phenomena that are occurring in the wider cosmos (including around us) as well as around us which scientists refer to as being virtual or non-local activity. We commonly know such activity as being metaphysical and paranormal phenomena which include consciousness, nature, clairvoyance and out-of-body experiences. It is from sub-quantum phenomena that quantum phenomena emerge, i.e., all that is relativistic/materialistic.
I also believe that our 3D universe metaphorically floats in a wider fourth dimension that is timeless, known in physics as Lorentz absolute time. These words also imply that the environment is negative, because all virtual (imaginary) phenomena therein have a velocity greater than the speed of light. This means instantaneous communication can occur in this environment even though it is not of an understandable nature to us. I believe that our bigger holistic selves are four dimensional because our organic selves house implicit phenomena such as consciousness, instinct and hidden abstract emotions. I also believe that we have two quite different states of consciousness and one of these is implicit (our direct connection with the abstract nature of my concept of a fourth dimension) and the other consciousness is explicit. I see our explicit consciousness and sub-consciousness as relating to the experiences and activities of our organic relativistic selves. I believe that all phenomena of a materialistic type that we have learned and experienced throughout our lives are derived from a conscious or explicit consciousness.
I have written a separate paper about my ideas in this area which includes my views about how the human mind and brain works in a conjunctional relationship, which in turn implies how we make decisions and subsequently behave. I have also brought forward supporting hypotheses and experiments that seem to support my notion that we have such a dual consciousness (implicit and explicit). These experiments include reputable medical and physical experiments described in the audio below. The physical experiments determining the existence of cosmic informational wave patterns include global random event generators, as well as studies of consciousness that incorporate ideas relating to the physics double slit experiment. In other words, I am saying that contemporary science (including physics) is slowly beginning to embrace many of the sub-quantum phenomenal ideas that I have written about and described over a number of years, even if physicists refer to such metaphysical ideas as being either virtual or non-local phenomena.
I will now return to briefly discuss what I see as being primordial explicit reality as most people commonly believe it to be, that is, what has happened, and is happening in reality to make it the way it is. My description will be brief, because I have written copiously about it in my website. I will continue to talk from a limited, two dimensional perspective and I will ignore my wider beliefs discussed earlier, that our 3D universe (plus Einstein clock time) metaphorically floats in a 4D dimension that features Lorentz absolute time. I see this relationship as being concurrent with the 4D dimension, being implicit phenomena (virtual and non-materialistic) and our space/time universe as being organic. By organic I mean.materialistic.
I believe that not only do we have implicit characteristics (which I think can be best described as experiences) occurring within our relativistic organic selves but these same implicit characteristics are, in my opinion, likely to be occurring in a macro sense within a millimeter or less from our explicit selves, that is, within my concept of a fourth dimension. Obviously, we do not consciously know this. However, I suggest that we can intuitively sense its presence such at times when we have an unexpected sense of expanded consciousness. The point I’m attempting to make here is that in my opinion, our explicit (organic) selves exist within a hair’s breadth of some sort of wider cosmic environment, and that until this point in time, contemporary physics has not been able to reliably identify or describe it. I will now briefly discuss how, from a scientific perspective, I see how the reality picture that I have been talking about fits together.
I argue that before the Big Bang, there existed a 4D dimension along the lines that I have just discussed. I believe that there existed a universal cosmic particle that informationally created the Big Bang in the first place, and that this particle has universal cosmic properties by which it can transverse all other dimensions and universes. An experiment has been devised by my associate that may assist in establishing the truth of this statement. I have also discussed my ideas in this area in my website as well as in a separate hardcopy paper that I have written on the subject. I claim that the two inherent features of my concept of a universal particle are timeless primordial awareness and individual patterns of thoughts that I have nominated as being particles. I believe that both primordial awareness and its associated particle/s exist and operate in a seamless conjunctional relationship with each other. By this I mean a cosmic field. I suggest that not only did my concept of a universal particle create the characteristics that caused the Big Bang in the first place at a virtual and implicit level, but it also created the implicit phenomena that constitute 3D space as well. By this I mean that the elements of primordial awareness (embracing the universal particle/s) can be seen as a type of cosmic space foam that manifests itself as a wave throughout our universe. In a broader sense I am suggesting the following:-
The universal particle took upon itself both implicit and explicit characteristics. The implicit characteristics are the virtual (metaphysical and massless) characteristics that existed in my concept of a fourth dimension in the first place. The explicit characteristics it bought with it I see as being a molten plasma of quarks, leptons (sub-quarks) and gluons (particle binders necessary to create material atoms). I believe that this cocktail of activity that was taking place at the time of the Big Bang, once the plasma cooled, was like minute strings of material elements of my concept of a universal particle. I believe that these same strings account for the creation of tachyon fields which are a prerequisite for the creation of all Higgs particles, including us. The question that emerges from these words is that if my ideas have scientific merit, then how best is it possible to two dimensionally describe the wide ranging phenomena that I have just talked about. I suggest that this may be along the following lines:
1] Treat the Planck length (the deepest level of physics that physicists can determine and understand) as the arbitrary boundary line between quantum and my notion of sub-quantum phenomena i.e., the borderline between implicit (non-materialistic) phenomena such as consciousness and all that is materialistic such as the computer I am using to write this document.
2] Describe how both the implicit and explicit characteristics of my concept of a universal particle play an experiential role between the quantum (explicit) and sub-quantum (implicit) phenomena I have described above (including supporting mathematics as described by mathematicians such as Hiley, Valentini and others).
3] Amend the standard model of quantum mechanics so that it may embrace and then make predictions relating to items 1 and 2 above.
I close this blog by making the following important statement. I believe that the contents of this statement are likely to eventually have an influential role in how items one to three above are collectively researched and described by physicists in the future. Since the late 1880s there has been a strong suspicion in physics that there are cosmic waves passing through the universe (Michelson and Morley in 1887). This suspicion was reinforced by other experiments conducted by English physicists and finally it was in 1929 that an American physicist by the name of Dayton Miller conducted a range of experiments that seemed at the time to confirm the findings of all other previous experiments relating to cosmic aether movements through the universe. This means that the contents of our 3D universe are not static, that there is a continuum of waves passing through it as well as all physical phenomena, including you and me.
When Miller conducted his ground-breaking experiments, Einstein’s Relativity and Special Relativity physics models were already well grounded in science, and for whatever reason, Miller’s experiment were consistently dismissed by his international peers. More contemporary physics experiments (incorporating global random event generators) seem to consistently confirm Miller’s 1929 findings relating to cosmic wave movement across the universe. If these latter experiments can be consistently replicated in the future (as they already have been by Cahill and others), then this is a confirmation of all earlier cosmic wave movement experiments since 1887, more particularly those of Dayton Miller in 1929. A conclusion is that both Relativity and Special Relativity physics are no longer completely valid, and that they are likely to be partly replaced by Lorentzian Relativity physics.
Furthermore, Lorentz absolute time will be proven to be as scientifically valid as Einstein’s relative clock time. That is, Lorentz time will work concurrently with relative time in physics models. This does not imply that Einstein was completely wrong. It seems to imply that he may not have completely comprehended the full cosmic picture at the time he developed relativistic theories. From my perspective, the implication of such important changes in scientific thinking is that the metaphysical (implicit) elements of my argument may then be able to embraced by a modified version of quantum field theory. Quantum field theory already allows for the changes of physics effects that I have just talked about. It would also mean that my concept of our 3D universe floating in a timeless fourth dimension would probably have a greater degree of merit than it would otherwise have. This includes the possible existence of an afterlife as well as most other phenomena that are widely described in science as being metaphysical, and therefore of no interest to scientists. Metaphysical phenomena not only exist, but are also an important component of mainstream science as well. This has been my argument with all of my science related beliefs and associated writings.