A peek into how ‘things’ might work. Something to think about

I recently wrote this item for the benefit of a young relative. I wrote it to encourage him to be not afraid to think about what the “big picture” might be in the wider universe around us. I have made no serious attempt to prove anything and kept the references to a minimum.


“All ‘things’ are somehow related to quantum fields (fields)*. There are relative (temporal) and non- relative (ontological) fields and both can be seen as influences relating to some sort of universal ‘whole’. Whereas temporal fields relate to observable and measurable ‘things’ and events related thereto, this is not the case with ontological fields that include intuition and awareness. This means that there are two different types of causation with respect to the workings of the ‘whole’.

There are givens (meaning simply how things are) in the universe. These include gravitation of at least two different types, that relate to either the effects of the Big Bang or to the rules of nature, such as those between objects such as galaxies and other types of universal systems. These might also include other universes and dimensions. Light, electricity, magnetism and the hidden laws of random and geometric nature are also givens. All of these givens have effects of some kind on each other.

They, and their inherent individual properties seem to be influenced and ‘carried’ by a ‘hidden’ (in physics called hidden variables)** ontological neural network. One example of a property is speed as it relates to light, and another is electrical charge as it relates to the properties of the electrons and photons in atoms. Science does not know how it is that particles (like gluons and quarks that ‘hold’ the universe together) have the mysterious ontological properties that they do, nor for what reason they act in manner that they do.

Temporal objects and their relationship to other temporal objects are related to clocks and/or the speed of light as per the rules of relativity physics, that is, between smaller or larger objects. Motion of objects is also temporal. The effects (influences between objects not touching each other) of these diverse temporal relationships can be linked to standard causation scientific theory.

They are knowable, observable and measurable. On the other hand, ontological effects between objects are knowable and can be experientially detected (like psychokinesis and telepathy), but they cannot be observed and measured in accordance with the normal rules of physics. Both of these ‘types’ of temporal and ontological effects are relational to a separate holistic ontological field that is related to the external ‘perimeter’ of an ever expanding universe (as it relates to the speed of light).

This three-way concurrent relationship can be seen as being in different temporal and ontological ‘averages, densities and ratios’ with each other. All fields can be seen as containing patterns of information that mean something. These concurrent relationships between each of these three ‘fields’ is in turn related to the ontological sub-quantum rules of quantum mechanics. This is a field of indeterminate randomness. The rules of temporal relativity physics is determinate. It is the indeterminate effects of the universal ontological whole that are causal to the wider universe as being random. This theory can also be applied to the ontological and temporal human condition as well as its ‘connection’ with the wider field of nature.

All things and events operate within their own temporal or ontological field reference frames. These reference frames might be seen as being like continuums that exist in a parallel concurrent relationship with each other until the speed of the expanding universe exceeds that of the speed of light. It is this ontological relationship that gives ‘meaning and purpose’ to universal reality. This is through continuously changing morphic resonance and fields (ontological sub-quantum telepathy-like influences between organisms that is the cause of the formation of matter as discussed in item two).

We, as ‘complete’ persons, together with our thoughts, decisions and behaviour are representations of this universal process, the oneness of the universe.

There are seven demonstrable and describable ontological (sub-quantum) keys that help to explain this dual relationship as well as how it might work in the manner that it does (they are too complicated to include in this type of document. If you are interested in them please mail me and I will send you a copy. One of them is non local entanglement theory as demonstrated in the cited animated video).

If you are confused about this type of complex quantum field physics debate the following quote is linked to a statement that the late distinguished physics Richard Feynman made to students before one of his lectures.

Quote:”…Will you understand what I’m going to tell you?… No, you’re not going to be able to understand it-You see, my physics students don’t understand it either. That is because I don’t understand it. Nobody does.”

As a concept scientist I fall into this bracket too.

“…Reality is fundamentally different from our classical picture of a smooth, continuous, well-defined Universe. Although it’s true that these quantum fields began as a mathematical construct, they describe our physical, observable reality more accurately than any other theory we’ve concocted…”

** An example of a hidden variable is…


“Consider elementary school students’ shoe sizes and scores on a standard reading exam. They are correlated, but assert that larger shoe size causes higher reading scores is as ridiculous as saying that high reading scores cause larger shoe size. In this example, there is a clear hidden variable, namely, age”

I suspect that the distinguished physicist Dr Adam Becker might also be echoing some of these points in his 2018 Harvard University lecture as well.

Later amendments and corrections are envisaged.”

Do some people think that science is a belief system?

It is important that you view the contents of this blog in relationship to my new blog entitled: “The fundamental universe revisited“. This new blog is designed to be the master science referential blog for all my science blog postings in my website.

It seems that they do

I will introduce you to a very popular science lecture presented by Rupert Sheldrake. It was banned for a time because of its contentious nature within science circles. Readers will find that I have cited Sheldrake’s ideas in different blogs in my website because I find them interesting and provocative. If you elect to view this video I feel you that you will understand why I have made this comment. I think my readers should also know that many of Sheldrake’s science theories and ideas were built upon those of the highly respected philosopher, logician, mathematician, and scientist, Charles Sanders Peirce. I feel that  you may care to acquaint yourself with Peirce’s ideas as well.

The Sheldrake video is here

If you like what you heard Sheldrake say I suggest you also peruse the contents of another one of my blogs entitled “Two respected scientists talk about life and nothing“. By you understanding the contents of both these blogs I feel you may then better understand my way of scientific and philosophical thinking about not only life but wider reality as well. Furthermore for my readers who have a strong interest in physics I further suggest that you read the pdf file entitled “Morphic Fields and the Implicate Order“. I feel that you will be happy if you do this. If you have not heard of David Bohm before you may care to visit the blog I have created about Bohm.

Can science create a visible quantum object?

It is important that you view the contents of this blog in relationship to my new blog entitled: “The fundamental universe revisited“. This new blog is designed to be the master science referential blog for all my science blog postings in my website.

It seems that it can

In a breakthrough experiment an object has been created that is visible to the unaided eye, but has been shown to be in two places at the same time

If this is the case it seems to me that this is another good example as to how metaphysical science plays such an important role in understanding wider reality.

The video

I would like to introduce you to the pure beauty of fractals

It is important that you view the contents of this blog in relationship to my new blog entitled: “The fundamental universe revisited“. This new blog is designed to be the master science referential blog for all my science blog postings in my website.

It is my opinion that fractal imagery as reflected in nature is a clear pointer to the essential nature of reality at every conceivable level

I think fractals are a great representation of whatever infinity may mean. I suggest my readers view this beautiful presentation of music and perpetual fractal patterns.

Here is a story about how fractals play such an important role in the universe and perhaps beyond.

How the infinite term in mathematics gets thrown away

I introduce you to two videos that seem to support the following quotation


“In modern terms, Dr. Frenkel explained, the gist of the calculations can be interpreted as saying that the infinite sum has three separate parts: one of which blows up when you go to infinity, one of which goes to zero, and minus 1/12. The infinite term, he said, just gets thrown away.”

Introductory short version

Extended version of the same presentation

Also see the related New York Times article

Quantum effects can be replicated on a macro scale

Fluid Tests Hint at Concrete Quantum Reality

This video demonstrates that phenomena at a quantum level can be replicated in a limited manner on a macroscopic scale. The implications of this experiment in relationship to the future of physics seems to be immense. For the first time physicists can demonstrate quantum effects at a scale previously not thought to be possible.

Film made of the experiment, includes CGI charts [no sound]:


Lab demonstration of the same experiment with sound and explanation:


Original article in pdf format. Readers will notice where I have underlined in red sections that I feel are most relevant:

Fluid Tests Hint at Concrete Quantum Reality

Especially selected videos for reader appreciation

This blog is for my readers that have a limited knowledge about physics. There are many videos in this range that I feel will interest you, if you would like to understand some of the mysteries of the universe.

Metaphysical surprises – mind over matter

I strongly urge my readers to view this video. The most important scientific part is featured towards the end of the presentation.


A simple explanation of the double slit experiment.

This video explains or demonstrates the mysterious wave-particle phenomena in physics.


Also see this wikipedia article on the same subject

A simple explanation of quantum entanglement

This video demonstrates how it is possible that all things in the universe are somehow connected with each other. This includes you and me.


Also see this wikipedia article on the same subject

You cannot avoid fractals!

This short video talks about how all phenomena have fractal features. This includes mountain ranges, roses in your garden and your lungs.


A new way of looking at reality

You will find in my website that contemporary physics is in a state of crisis. The contents of this audio related to what may be a completely new way of looking at the physics of reality. I think you will find it easy to understand.


A down to earth story about cosmic aether

If you read my blog entitled “The day science lost its way” you will find how I argue that it is likely that cosmological aether theory may once again come back into vogue in mainstream physics. This video is an elementary talk about aether.