New physics is not new at all

Has an inconvenient truth existed in physics for the last two hundred years?

I have chosen to be provocative with my introduction because in my opinion there is a great man in history who has arguably contributed as much to the evolution of physics as have Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein. Furthermore, this outstanding figure was not afraid to tear away materialist physics either. In other words he believes in metaphysical physics. In many ways I think he lived and worked mostly in the sub-quantum world, and for this reason alone I feel he is a great leader within physics in his own right. The person I am talking about is the Swedish born theologian, philosopher and scientist Emmanuel Swedenborg.

If you have never heard of Emmanuel Swedenborg I urge you to take time out to read what the science writer Michael Talbot wrote about him. The article is attached. As many of my readers would probably know, I am very interested in holographic scientific theory and other theories that seem to me to be related. In particular I feel attracted to the Bohm and Pibram holographic brain theories as well as, more lately, Cahill’s Process Physics model, which is based upon his own neural network theory

Talbot draws attention to what he feels is Swedenborg’s uncanny insights about reality that are explainable in terms of the holographic paradigm. Talbot also draws attention to Swedenborg’s belief about there being a deeper level of reality that he described as being of ‘…angels of the third heaven’. In other words, Swedenborg seems to be saying that there is no distinction between what is symbolic and that which is real. I argue that symbolic reality is sub-quantum reality (like consciousness), whereas standard model physics refers to such phenomena as being irrelevant metaphysics These are the reasons why I feel you will find the contents of Talbot’s article quite compelling. It may also help you understand a little more about my own theory about awareness and thought.

Talbot on Swedenborg.pdf

Why I think David Bohm is a hero of science

Bohm cared to get to the bottom of all things, including reality

It is no secret that I feel David Bohm is amongst the deepest thinking and cleverest scientists of all time. Bohm dared to think about and explain what many other scientists of his generation thought was ludicrous, and was prepared to embrace the most profound ideas of Eastern philosophy into his scientific theories as well.

If you take time to look more closely at the life and times of David Bohm in the attachments, I think you will see the man to be scientifically very insightful and gifted, and a person with a deep sense of personal and social morality as well. He said that each individual in his life is in total contact with all other things (phenomena), including us with each other (his implicate order model). Furthermore, if mankind takes the time to recognize this connectedness then the problems of the world would sort themselves out.

I think if you can understand where Bohm is coming from with his views about science and life in general, you will understand my instinctual views as well, together with the reasons why. I have incorporated two secondary works about the life, times and beliefs of David Bohm. I feel you will find them reasonably straightforward to read and his words gripping and challenging, even if you do not agree with them.

Bohm for website.pdf

Why I think we are all order within chaos [fractals]

Welcome to the wonderful world of fractals

Have you ever wondered what keeps you in organic and cosmic balance in tune with the wider universe? You may feel this is a fanciful story but it is not. This blog is about fractals, Fractal theories are not likely to be taught in schools because I have read it is impossible to reconcile phenomena of this type within Albert Einstein’s equations relating to the distribution of space matter. However, regardless of this possible difficulty I will discuss with you what I feel is the phenomena that not only holds us together but helps set directions in our lives as well. I am not ignoring the role gravity plays in organically stabilizing us but I am ignoring this phenomena for now as well. I think you will find the fractal story a fascinating one. It is far too big a story to relate in a few words but I will do my best by means of metaphors. The well illustrated file attached has been inserted to assist you in this respect.

I think it is true to say without fractals there would be no such thing as cosmic balance. This means all things appear to be fragmented and chaotic. This includes within and around you and me as well. Fractals are like a system of identifiable inward-order of all things, an order that is staring us all in the face if we care to look for it. This includes flowers in our garden, my lungs, the shapes of ram’s horns, the shape of a shell fish and nearly all phenomena that is imaginable, including behavioral aspects of the cosmos itself. I believe all things in life, including a mere thought are different in some way, however subtly. However, amongst these differences are entwined an invisible system that brings some sort of degree of similarity of these differences which eventually grows into patterns of differences. It could be said these differences make a difference to differences which in turn can be seen to be like a neural network in our body. Furthermore these patterns both change and are infinitesimal in size and you will see this in the complexity of all of nature which includes the head of a simple rose. Have a close look at a rose flower. The patterns of the petals are not random. There is a distinct pattern within their organization from the heart of the rose. This is a non-liner process, a process that needs merely a minute amount of energy to both kick start it and keep it functional. Every petal of the rose that grows is resultant from a tiny puff of new energy and it is the inherit fractal guided energy within the cosmos that brings with it the same inherit fractal patterns that this rose petal is guided by as well (see illustration within the associated file). This same process manifests itself in all things and it is because a famous mathematician by the name of Mandelbrot we have been privileged to better understand these things and it is also the result thereof I was able to develop the blob-physics idea in my efforts to help understand reality at every conceivable level.

Mandelbrot has identified and described the amazing world of fractals in nature and furthermore has been able to show how computers can be programmed to replicate every facet of nature in a manner that is nearly impossible to visually differentiate from original images emanating from nature. He has identified the role of a fourth dimension in relationship to our fractural connection with wider consciousness. He has identified curves in cross sections of magnetic fields that he suggests implies there is a 3D link to electromagnetism and it is therefore a deeply structural and fundamental part of life. Mandelbrot’s idea are akin to Bohm’s Implicit order model and also underpins my own beliefs in relationship to me linking blobs (patterns) of information and knowledge to each other. This in turn lead me to attempt to better understand all that we commonly perceive to be reality.

I feel that you will enjoy the following url links relating to fractals.

Arthur C Clarke talks about fractals

Fibonacci Fractals and Inorganic Teleology

The emerging crisis in physics. Will physics soon need to take a new course of direction?

The magazine Scientific American seems to think this may be the case. You may also find my two blogs relating to this topic are interesting as well

These two blogs are entitled “The questionable nature of the Standard model of physics” and “Is the scientific method living up to it’s own expectations?“.

The problem for the standard model of physics is that although it correctly describes the attributes of sub-atomic particles, it does not show how these remarkable particles have such attributes. This is why the question of the existence of super-symmetry is so important to physicist allying themselves to the Standard model of physics, whereas the alternative models (such as those of Bohm and Cahill) do not. The same position applies to my Awareness model where I describe reality as being emergent of a continuum of blobs of information and knowledge that is never ending. Furthermore, these blobs are self generating without any external force (energy) needed for them to continue doing so. The Bohm Implicit order (holographic) model works along similar lines as does the Cahill Process Physics model which I feel can be seen to be all somewhat parallel to each other. I am particularly interested in seeing the Bohm/Cahill type models come forward as credible alternative models to the Standard model because it would tend to substantiate my own views regarding the existence of a common awareness to all phenomena (not consciousness). I mean by this it is likely to have some degree of validity. Because these alternative models seem to be reliant on some type of memory (albeit short lived) to explain the perpetual expansionary mature of their models I think this is where the Awareness model may have a helpful feature to contribute to the debate because it has inherent memory embodied within it at every stage.

I have extracted certain phrases from the Scientific American magazine dated May 2014 so that you may share why I feel some of my words will make better sense. The sections I have copied for this blog are directly related to many of the comments I have just made. They relate to the huge urgency for physicists to finally determine the phenomena of super-symmetry, and the subsequent need for some type of alternative model to show how it is that physics can be so weird at times. More importantly of all, entrepreneurial physicists are already “rethinking of basic phenomena that underlies the fabric of the universe”. It seems to me such physicist already feel they have been defending a lost cause. The front cover of the Scientific American magazine is attached as well.

Excerpts from Scientific American may 2014.pdf

Is there such a thing as sub-quantum phenomena?

It is important that you view the contents of this blog in relationship to my new blog entitled: “The fundamental universe revisited“. This new blog is designed to be the master science referential blog for all my science blog postings in my website.

I believe there is and it can be scientifically demonstrated as such

I describe sub quantum phenomena as activities that are occurring in the universe at such a low level it is not observable or measurable by conventional physics research methodologies. As such physics has no serious interest in it but it is a topic of fascination for most cosmologists. I describe sub quantum phenomena as being phenomena that is occurring below the Planck level and that this is the point that my concept of a fourth dimension kicks in. If I am correct with my hypothesis then it is necessary for me to describe the sorts of sub quantum activities that may need to come together to both describe it as well as attempt to demonstrate how it may all interconnect to render it as being an argument of some of believable substance (meaning). In order to help me achieve this objective I created my Awareness model of (reality) Physics and in the process coined the phrase ‘fine quantum entangled’.

This phrase means that I believe all phenomena whatsoever is somehow linked to each other, whether it be below or above the Planck line, and the means of building a story about this interconnection is via fine quantum entanglement. Unfortunately conventional physics theorists refer to phenomena occurring at a sub-quantum level as being metaphysical and as such any discussion about it is merely pseudo science and therefore is scientifically meaningless. Many reputable scientists do not see this to be the case and, as an philosophical scientist, neither do I. I have built the whole of my reality model around sub quantum phenomena. I support my position by submitting to my readers the following abstract from Groessing’s 2013 thesis. Groessing is a respected scientist. Unfortunately most laypersons will probably find the abstract a bit hard going to understand (so do I). However, I feel it simply important for you to know that such material exists in the first place and furthermore it is credible. I have not only included this quote but also a url lead in to Groessing’s complete thesis:



Emergence of Quantum Mechanics from a Sub-Quantum Statistical Mechanics

Gerhard Groessing

(Submitted on 12 Apr 2013)

A research program within the scope of theories on “Emergent Quantum Mechanics” is presented, which has gained some momentum in recent years. Via the modeling of a quantum system as a non-equilibrium steady-state maintained by a permanent throughput of energy from the zero-point vacuum, the quantum is considered as an emergent system. We implement a specific “bouncer-walker” model in the context of an assumed sub-quantum statistical physics, in analogy to the results of experiments by Couder’s group on a classical wave-particle duality. We can thus give an explanation of various quantum mechanical features and results on the basis of a “21st century classical physics”, such as the appearance of Planck’s constant, the Schr\”odinger equation, etc. An essential result is given by the proof that averaged particle trajectories’ behaviors correspond to a specific type of anomalous diffusion termed “ballistic” diffusion on a sub-quantum level. It is further demonstrated both analytically and with the aid of computer simulations that our model provides explanations for various quantum effects such as double-slit or n-slit interference. We show the averaged trajectories emerging from our model to be identical to Bohmian trajectories, albeit without the need to invoke complex wave functions or any other quantum mechanical tool. Finally, the model provides new insights into the origins of entanglement, and, in particular, into the phenomenon of a “systemic” nonlocality.

Note: Readers should understand that non local means, in its most simplest interpretation, that something in the world of science is happening but no one seems to understand how it is happening or why. An example of this you may identify with is consciousness.

Richard dreams about many great things

His principal goal is to help save mankind from itself, and in the process, the planet as well.

My friend Richard is one of the most intelligent people I have ever met. In my opinion his general knowledge about a great number of topics is beyond belief. However, what sets Richard aside most of all is that he has had no formal tertiary education. He is a self-taught person! Richard confesses that he has made blunders along the way and also admits he has persistently misjudged human nature throughout his life. I see Richard as a gentle giant of a man, who is absolutely determined to save the planet from what he sees as the intrinsic evil of influential decision makers. He also loathes human complacency and our collective failure to not try to better understand what is really happening around us, and most importantly of all, not to attempt to do anything about it. I include the environment, economics and political and social justice with these words.

As a mark of honor and respect to Richard, I want to share with you three pieces of the voluminous amounts of material he has forwarded to me over time. For example, I may send Richard half a dozen lines about a topic I feel we are likely to have a mutual interest in, and he then spends countless hours forwarding back to me his ideas about the same topic. Not only does he spend extended time putting his ideas to paper but he researches it as well, principally from primary sources. Richard is proactive in the environment lobby. If Richard could influence a mere ten percent of the population to seriously believe Global Warming was a fact of life, I think he would succeed in his mission to save the global environment. If you take time out to read the three articles, I feel quite certain you would be in similar awe of Richard as I am.

●          Richard working out if he has bought the most efficient light bulb that is commonly available in the marketplace.

●          In response to a note I sent to Richard about the large amount of natural gas that exists in Russia, and the possibility that the Russian government would use these resources as a means of asserting greater political power, he responded in his usual most thorough manner. I had to think hard about a title to give this highly inclusive and interesting document. I could find no words that adequately do the job so I took a coward’s way out. I used language I feel most people could readily identify with.

●          Someone sent me an email comparing how Japan had emerged from the ashes of war to become not only a significant economic power but also has created infrastructure that is amongst the best in the world. The sender drew attention to his opinion that the U.S. was in its dying days of decline, and it was because Japan has no social security system and America has, he claims that this is why Japan is so far ahead in its economic progress. The author has attached copious amounts of photographs of comparison between each country to make his point, including derelict buildings in Detroit, which in its heyday was at the heart of the American automotive manufacturing industry. I think you will find Richard’s reaction as being to the point, and his use of language is vehement. Good on you Richard!

Richard various emails.pdf

My friend Fred

Fred and I worked in a retail store

I first met Fred around 1971. We worked together at a large regional retail store in the suburbs of Adelaide, South Australia. We regularly ate lunch together and over time we began to socialize with each other; this continued even after we both left the company. During this period we got to know quite a bit about each other, including our respective life values, hopes and life-long aspirations. However, more importantly than this, we shared our views about there being the possibility of a bigger picture pertaining to reality. In other words, the meaning of all things and what life is all about.

I entered university as a mature age student and Fred did similarly around two years later. We saw very little of each other from that period onwards as our lives went in different directions because of our respective marriages. I had a young family and  Fred was determined to reach the pinnacle of his academic career. I had always felt that Fred was highly intelligent, and I believe that his Catholic upbringing played a large part in his progress. His impeccable sense of honesty and dedication to any task  set him apart from most others. Fred completed a Ph. D. in Biology and later IT studies. As far as I know he now works for a large interstate bureaucracy

The reason I created this blog is because one day around 2000 I received a note from Fred suggesting we get together to once again chat about all things between birth and death. We did eventually meet but our busy life styles at the time were not conducive to meaningfully connecting in the way I had hoped it would. It was apparent to me that our educational differences also probably played a part in this failure to communicate.

Because Fred and I are both living around the fringes of permanent retirement. I will periodically insert material into this blog that I feel may be of interest to him with the hope we may one day resume old times chatter about all things between birth, death and perhaps more speculatively, even beyond that.

My friend Richard of the 70s

I met Richard at University

I first met Richard in 1978. We were both enrolled in the discipline of Sociology at a well-known university. Richard was some fifteen years younger than I. I had enrolled as a mature-aged student at around the age of thirty-six. Richard, I and another mature aged-student (Kaye) formed a fairly close relationship, and at times the three of us would have long chats over a glass of red,  and from time to time get a little high on magic mushrooms. I did my best to get into the spirit of university life, but I never took to mushrooms at all. My domestic life at the time was pretty heavy going, as I was compelled financially to work nearly full-time as well as remain enrolled as a  full-time student. My wife gave birth to an infant son that was very ill from birth, and this did not help my already tight living situation. My income came from a small business I operated from home, offering my services as a handyman doing such things as cleaning, gardening, painting, repairing roofs, grubbing blackberries and the like.

Having completed my ordinary degree, and because I could not find suitable conventional full-time work, I had to make a decision as to whether or not to enroll in the Honours year. I subsequently did so. I kept my little business going and once again I enrolled as a full-time student attempting to complete a double major in Sociology and Politics. Needless to say, with my hectic employment schedule and an awesome amount of university work to complete, I quickly learned that I had taken on  far more than I could possibly chew and began to flounder. It was at this point that Richard came to my rescue. Richard was a highly intelligent young man who went on to complete a Ph.D. in Sociology. He was also a highly efficient operator in terms of completing his own education. Richard graciously stood by my side for almost the whole of my Honours year. He helped me construct essays. He helped me understand highly abstract material relating to Sociological theory, which included Marxism. At the time Richard was a diehard Marxist, so I guess we were both lefties together, but I never really got the full hang of what Marx was on about. I ended up squeaking over the line at the end of the year, but merely by a whisker. Without Richard assistance at that time, the year would have been a disaster for me that would have probably have had a negative effect on my psyche for the remainder of my life.

These are the reasons why I publicly express my gratitude to Richard, who now lives with his family in Switzerland. It is my hope that one day we may again be able to recommence sharing our respective life experiences and contemporary beliefs and values.

The dynamic feature of the Awareness physics model is the SMUT particle

A practical experiment that supports the Awareness physics model

The following sub-atomic particle testing project is a joint experiment between Freeman and Grant. This preamble introduces the presentation that describes a physical experiment that supports the Awareness model hypothesis.

We demonstrate a test to authenticate the Awareness model as well as its perceived, diverse benefits to science. The Awareness model of physics is an all embracing theory that attempts to explain and describe all important facets of reality as we understand it to be. This includes the primordial beginnings of all existence. The Awareness model is akin to the Bohm holographic (implicit order) model which is well known in science circles, but there are technical differences and one of these is that the Awareness model defines and describes as specific (secular) commencement point for all of reality. The Bohm model does not.

The Bohm mode has been favorably tested whereas the Awareness model has not. The attached file provides evidence as to how a single type of physics particle can not only be tested but also provide some important complimentary benefits for physics as well. These include finding the centre of the universe and energy generation. There are other benefits as well which are discussed in a separate question and answer forum. The experiment sets forth to demonstrate the existence of a particle which has imaginary momentum. We have nominated the particle as being named the Static Mass Universe Tracking (SMUT) particle. The manner in which the experiment is created is also described.

The testing model is incorporated within the single pdf file that follows. This file provides all information in relationship to the experiment project. This includes a Q & A answer sheet that we feel is relevant for readers to be aware of. A series of separate blogs have been set aside for easier reader understanding. It is the same information as in the pdf file which is in a complete form.

The SMUT particle experiment master copy

The Static Mass Universe Tracking [SMUT] particle experiment

Generic introduction

This introductory paragraph to this blog has been inserted on May 17th 2015. It post- dates my writings below. If you have a special interest in this particular topic, I urge you to also acquaint yourself with the contents of a generic statement blog that I have created which I feel may help to more favorably add to your overall reading experience of this topic. I have designed this new complementary blog like a generic statement to support numerous other blogs on my website, more especially with regard to science-related ideas that I am sharing with you.

A scientific experiment to validate the Awareness model of physics

In other areas of this website we have mentioned scientific theories and ideas that are groundbreaking or unconventional. What is described below is a scientific experiment to support the concepts we have put forward. This experiment has practical applications beyond our theories. These applications will also be discussed here-under.

Premise: We believe that if particles with imaginary properties, i.e. (imaginary charge, imaginary spin, imaginary mass) and so-on exist, then particles with imaginary momentum must exist, as it can be an attribute of a particle. The most famous particles with imaginary properties are tachyon particles.

If a particle has imaginary momentum (which is imaginary motion) it cannot have real momentum (real motion). It therefore must be static because imaginary motion would completely exclude real motion. We call this particle the Static Mass Universe Tracking [SMUT] particle. “Static mass,” because it is a static mass and “Universe tracking” because it tracks through the universe in relation to a side experiment that can be done in addition to the main experiment we are proposing.

We should state here that our experiment is not related to proving relativity physics concepts. Our work is more akin to the holographic model of cosmology (Bohm).

This is a concept statement of a hypothesis we support

Preamble: If the SMUT particle can be measured it proves that other particles, like the all seasons type particle of our theory can exist. We further believe that it is possible to measure the SMUT particle via conventional scientific apparatus, we will further describe the experiment in this document. It is our opinion if the characteristics of this particle can be demonstrated and observed this would lead to it being possible to determine where the centre of the universe is, that would be a secondary effect of the experiment. For those that are not familiar with cosmology and physics what we are saying is that this new particle we are talking about does not move with the expanding universe, but remains static at its point of creation. We believe if our hypothesis has merit, the implications for science are significant.

For now we will go on to describe some key concepts that must be known about the experiment. A vitally important piece of information is that we ourselves are not static in the universe. We are moving with the universe, by this I mean the Earth is rotating beneath us, it also orbits the Sun, the Sun orbits the centre of the Milky Way galaxy and the Milky Way galaxy travels through the universe. We are always moving along with the Earth. What you have to remember is that the SMUT particle is not moving with the Earth or any other astronomical body. It remains dormant at the point it was created. The SMUT particle gives a very convincing illusion that it is moving, but this is only an illusion. What is really happening is that the Earth and therefore we, because we are on the Earth, are moving away from where the SMUT particle was created. Furthermore the speed the SMUT particle travels at is the sum of the motions we and the Earth are experiencing. When we create a SMUT particle in the lab, the lab is pulled along with the rotation and orbit of the Earth and the SMUT particle is left behind where the lab and ourselves once were.

The SMUT particle does not break the laws of science

Another key concept of our ideas is that the SMUT particle does not break the laws of science, including causation or conservation of energy. It is not indestructible, it can be converted into energy and it behaves for the most part like any other particle. It stays in a wave form until observed and becomes a particle like any other atomic particle/wave would. This is important when it gets detected in the experiment as described below. Another important facet of the SMUT particle is that it cannot have zero rest mass as a photon has, because zero rest mass particles dissolve into energy if they are stopped or are static. The SMUT particle has to have a measurable mass in order to exist. This will help in its detection in the experiment. Its other attributes, apart from magnetic charge and imaginary motion/momentum are not relevant to our endeavor.

The experiment described in this document utilizes existing technologies and theories which we will mention here but not go into detail as it would be redundant, as such information is publicly available for those who search for it. However, for the benefit of laypeople it is appropriate for you to appreciate that energy exists in any forum whatsoever including in a vacuum. This effectively means if a universe was a vacuum there would be energy inherent in it anyway. This can be demonstrated by the well known Casimir effect. The process uses two mirror like metallic plates with no electric charge put close together. They interact with the virtual energy of a vacuum in a way that draws such energies, and their related particles, into our reality. The Casimir effect is a way of turning virtual particles that make up a vacuum of space into real (material) particles. When a virtual particle is drawn into real space (our reality) it becomes a real particle that we are familiar with like an electron, photon, quark, lepton and so-on. Sometimes the type of particle drawn into real space has a very short lifespan, but that does not invalidate the fact it was drawn into real space.

The relevance of the Casimir effect to the experiment

We will now talk further about how the Casimir effect must play a part in the main experiment. The Casimir effect is used in the experiment to bring into reality the SMUT particle, along with the other virtual particles and energies. SMUT particles, like other virtual particles, would already be in virtual form in a vacuum. In this case we are using the Casimir effect to draw the virtual version of the SMUT particle into reality. We need to do this in order to measure them with conventional scientific measuring devices. In the graphics below, the device employing the Casimir effect would be at point D in the topmost part of the experiment diagram. A secondary diagram describes a customized version of Casimir plates that the experiment needs in order to work.

The arrangement and type of atomic particle detectors use in the experiment

Points B and C in the diagram of the SMUT particle experiment (first diagram below) are spherical arrangements of atomic particle detectors. The detectors needed in the main version of this experiment would be ones that the SMUT particle could travel through and be detected on its journey. On the other hand, if you want to use the SMUT particle as a generator, which is possible, you would use a detector that absorbs the SMUT particle. For this you would use a very simple detector made of a dense metal (like lead) plate that the SMUT particle would crash into on its journey. This would reduce the particle to energy. This type of detector is called a Microchannel plate detector and is already used in scientific research. Scientists measure the radiations emitted when particles strike the metal plate. This gives them information about the quantum particles they are studying.

For the main experiment you would use detectors that the SMUT particle would travel through and not absorb the SMUT particle. These are much more complicated devices than a simple dense metal plate. These are run on the premise that there is something that the particle being observed interacts with as it passes through the area where it is recorded. Usually the substance being interacted with is gaseous, hence the name Gaseous ionization detector. The neutrino detector is an example of this concept. It sometimes uses chlorine as the substance that the neutrino particle interacts with, however the chlorine is in a liquid form in this type of detector.

Use of an atomic clock in the experiment

It is important to note is that we are using two layers of detectors. This is to detect if there is any change in “perceived motion” of the SMUT particle. We do not know at this time what direction or speed the SMUT particle will travel in, or at what speed. We may detect a variable speed in the SMUT particle’s journey, and that would give us clues about the Earth’s, Sun’s and Milky Way’s movement in the universe. The same goes for using an atomic clock (ultra accurate clock) in the experiment. The atomic clock represented by point A in the upper part of the experiment diagram is set off when the first SMUT particle is produced. We measure the time it takes to get through the detectors. This tells us the “perceived speed” of the SMUT particle. This can also tell us about the movement in the universe of the Earth, Sun and Milky Way, because it would tell us what kinds of speeds those astronomical bodies are traveling.

The relevance of Earth’s motion in the experiment

In the experiment our goal is to produce a stream of SMUT particles for a single day. The idea is to track where they land in the spheres of detectors around point D, where the SMUT particles originate in the experiment. As mentioned earlier, the Earth is moving and we are on the Earth. So is the lab the SMUT particles are generated in. The idea is that as the Earth rotates the lab and the sphere of detectors rotate with it. The result would be that the SMUT particles would always “move away” in one direction only – that being the opposite direction to where the Earth is moving to. Thus, as the Earth rotates and because the SMUT particles always “move away” in the same direction, a circular pattern would appear in the spheres of detectors. This is described in a diagram below. It would look like a circle drawn around the edge of the detection spheres. It is like rotating a roll of cardboard and putting pen on it. The pen stays static in your hand while the roll of cardboard is moving. This is what is happening with the SMUT particles, they are static while the detectors are moving. We see the SMUT particle as “moving” and the detectors as static because we are moving at the same rate as the detectors. The detectors are static on the Earth’s surface, as we would be standing near them. That gives the illusion that the SMUT particle is moving and we are not.

The ring pattern is important, it proves the SMUT particle exists. If the particle did not exist there would be no ring pattern in the detectors, all you would see in the results are a random assortment of other particles hitting the detectors. You would still get those particles in this experiment, but you would see amongst the random hits a circle pattern going around the sphere of detectors. The ring pattern would look something like an equator around a globe of Earth model, but a bit more offset.

For further information about the Awareness model of physics click the link below:

A PDF containing the important parts of the SMUT particle experiment can be found here:

The SMUT particle experiment master copy

Main diagram referred to in text above:

Static particle experiment 1 new

Other supporting diagrams:

Static particle experiment 2 new


custom casimir plates with text