# A closer look at the SMUT particle

Excepts from this website that describe the SMUT particle in detail

This section contains various excerpts from other blogs posted in this website. The material, with the relevant links provided, detail all useful information about the SMUT [Static Mass Universe Tracking] particle.

It is felt that writing a new article about the SMUT particle is redundant as all the necessary details of its properties are already cited in various blogs posted on this website.

We have presented the excepts in various sub-sections as follows.

What is the SMUT particle?

“…We believe that if particles with imaginary properties, i.e. (imaginary charge, imaginary spin, imaginary mass) and so-on exist, then particles with imaginary momentum must exist, as it can be an attribute of a particle. The most famous particles with imaginary properties are tachyon particles.

If a particle has imaginary momentum (which is imaginary motion) it cannot have real momentum (real motion). It therefore must be static because imaginary motion would completely exclude real motion. We call this particle the Static Mass Universe Tracking [SMUT] particle. “Static mass,” because it is a static mass and “Universe tracking” because it tracks through the universe in relation to a side experiment that can be done in addition to the main experiment we are proposing.”

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/the-static-mass-universe-tracking-s-m-u-t-particle-experiment/

“Could the SMUT particle be used as a laser?

No, laser beams are made from photons, SMUT particles and photons are not the same thing. A photon has a zero rest mass, meaning no mass while it is motionless. A SMUT particle must have a rest mass, being motionless it has to have a definable measurable mass while it is motionless or it would dissipate before it could ever form.”

How does the SMUT particle work?

“For now we will go on to describe some key concepts that must be known about the experiment. A vitally important piece of information is that we ourselves are not static in the universe. We are moving with the universe, by this I mean the Earth is rotating beneath us, it also orbits the Sun, the Sun orbits the centre of the Milky Way galaxy and the Milky Way galaxy travels through the universe. We are always moving along with the Earth. What you have to remember is that the SMUT particle is not moving with the Earth or any other astronomical body. It remains dormant at the point it was created. The SMUT particle gives a very convincing illusion that it is moving, but this is only an illusion. What is really happening is that the Earth and therefore we, because we are on the Earth, are moving away from where the SMUT particle was created. Furthermore the speed the SMUT particle travels at is the sum of the motions we and the Earth are experiencing. When we create a SMUT particle in the lab, the lab is pulled along with the rotation and orbit of the Earth and the SMUT particle is left behind where the lab and ourselves once were.”

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/the-static-mass-universe-tracking-s-m-u-t-particle-experiment/

“It has to be noted that the SMUT particle appears to move because it is static and the universe moves around it. If you were to detect a SMUT particle you would see it in motion because you are in motion due to the Earth’s movement through space. Because of this effect, from the point of an observer the SMUT the particle appears as a moving particle, but this is an illusion. The SMUT particle gives the illusion that it is in motion, but it is truly static.”

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/concluding-the-s-m-u-t-particle-debate/

“…We have discovered online works done in relation to researching tachyons. The articles we refer to for this as Bilaniuk_Metarelativity, and https://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/jcuevas/Teaching/Taquiones.pdf…”

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/concluding-the-s-m-u-t-particle-debate/

“…In these articles we found that the error committed in finding tachyons was trying to observe their effects, such as Cherenkov radiation. These experiments failed and the research was abandoned. The difference between the SMUT particle experiment and the experiments done decades ago is that my experiment tries to observe the SMUT particle directly as opposed to observing the effects given off by a particle. Trying to observe only the effects of a tachyon may be why the older experiments failed.

The same articles also refer to the mathematics involved in static particles. Admittedly the equations shown were not proof that static particles can be mathematically proven to possibly exist, as is the situation with the equations relating to the tachyon. It has to be said that the mathematics referred to in the articles lends weight to the idea that static particles, such as the SMUT particle could be proven to exist mathematically by someone versed in creating physics related equations.”

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/concluding-the-s-m-u-t-particle-debate/

Creation of the SMUT particle

“The Casimir effect has an important ole to play in the SMUT particle experiment as it is the way to access, i.e. create SMUT particles. The details of how the Casimir effect works are described in the audio provided below and in this Youtube link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRcmqZkGOK4. By the process of the Casimir effect on virtual particles in the space foam we can bring SMUT particles into our existence. From there we can measure them in the SMUT particle experiment.”

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/concluding-the-s-m-u-t-particle-debate/

“What causes the creation of virtual SMUT particles before they were bought to the ‘real’ universe in the SMUT particle experiment?

I would say the Big Bang, or atomic and sub-atomic reactions would do this. Energies captured in the Casimir effect could also become SMUT particles. There is much about these sorts of sub-atomic and atomic reactions we are yet to discover. I would be willing to say that the SMUT particle could be created in some of those reactions.”

“The experiment described in this document utilizes existing technologies and theories which we will mention here but not go into detail as it would be redundant, as such information is publicly available for those who search for it. However, for the benefit of laypeople it is appropriate for you to appreciate that energy exists in any forum whatsoever including in a vacuum. This effectively means if a universe was a vacuum there would be energy inherent in it anyway. This can be demonstrated by the well known Casimir effect. The process uses two mirror like metallic plates with no electric charge put close together. They interact with the virtual energy of a vacuum in a way that draws such energies, and their related particles, into our reality. The Casimir effect is a way of turning virtual particles that make up a vacuum of space into real (material) particles. When a virtual particle is drawn into real space (our reality) it becomes a real particle that we are familiar with like an electron, photon, quark, lepton and so-on. Sometimes the type of particle drawn into real space has a very short lifespan, but that does not invalidate the fact it was drawn into real space.”

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/the-static-mass-universe-tracking-s-m-u-t-particle-experiment/

The SMUT particle is observable and measurable

“…If the SMUT particle can be measured it proves that other particles, like the all seasons type particle of our theory can exist. We further believe that it is possible to measure the SMUT particle via conventional scientific apparatus, we will further describe the experiment in this document. It is our opinion if the characteristics of this particle can be demonstrated and observed this would lead to it being possible to determine where the centre of the universe is, that would be a secondary effect of the experiment. For those that are not familiar with cosmology and physics what we are saying is that this new particle we are talking about does not move with the expanding universe, but remains static at its point of creation. We believe if our hypothesis has merit, the implications for science are significant.”

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/the-static-mass-universe-tracking-s-m-u-t-particle-experiment/

The SMUT particle conforms to laws of science

“Another key concept of our ideas is that the SMUT particle does not break the laws of science, including causation or conservation of energy. It is not indestructible, it can be converted into energy and it behaves for the most part like any other particle. It stays in a wave form until observed and becomes a particle like any other atomic particle/wave would. This is important when it gets detected in the experiment as described below. Another important facet of the SMUT particle is that it cannot have zero rest mass as a photon has, because zero rest mass particles dissolve into energy if they are stopped or are static. The SMUT particle has to have a measurable mass in order to exist. This will help in its detection in the experiment. Its other attributes, apart from magnetic charge and imaginary motion/momentum are not relevant to our endeavor.”

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/the-static-mass-universe-tracking-s-m-u-t-particle-experiment/

An important exemption to the above paragraph:

“For those who may be skeptics of the SMUT particle concept in relationship to the uncertainty principle. The uncertainty principle only applies to particles with real momentum. The SMUT particle has imaginary momentum and this changes its relationship to the uncertainty principle. The SMUT particle does not speed up or slow down, this would cause it to lose energy and convert into cosmic rays. Its wavelength would not get larger as it slows down because it cannot change speed without potentially being destroyed.

In the experiment to detect the SMUT particle we do not know exactly where it was formed. After it has formed it becomes a wave as would any other quantum particle and appears to move towards the detectors surrounding the SMUT particle’s point of origin. The size of the wave is irrelevant as it still collapses as it appears to travel through the detectors, just as any other particle would. This negates the De Broglie wavelength theory.”

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/concluding-the-s-m-u-t-particle-debate/

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/concluding-the-s-m-u-t-particle-debate/

Relationship with the All Seasons particle

“To be taken seriously a scientific hypothesis needs an experiment or mathematical formulae (preferably both). I came up with a hypothesis – particles with imaginary attributes exist. The SMUT particle experiment is a way of proving the hypothesis by putting a particle with imaginary attributes into a position where it can be observed and measured by detection technology that exists today.”

“The reason for the importance of the SMUT particle in the Awareness model of physics is that if you can prove the existence of the SMUT particle, as described in the SMUT particle experiment, then it proves that the All Seasons particle can exist. The All Seasons Particle is the backbone of the Awareness physics model.”

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/concluding-the-s-m-u-t-particle-debate/

“We have classified the All Seasons, SMUT, tachyon and dybbuk as all in the same family of particles as they all have imaginary properties. The SMUT particle relates to the All Seasons particle in two ways: One is that the SMUT particle can be derived from the All Seasons particle, either with a tachyon or without. Two, the SMUT particle and the All Seasons particle are both particles that have imaginary properties. The SMUT particles has imaginary momentum, the All Seasons particle has other properties that are imaginary except that of momentum.”

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/concluding-the-s-m-u-t-particle-debate/

For the full details of the SMUT particle experiment follow the link below:

http://www.jonathonfreeman.org/the-static-mass-universe-tracking-s-m-u-t-particle-experiment/

Grant 25/11/14